Trial of King Charles free essay sample

Josh Robinson Mr.. Comer 15 November 2012 Trial of King Charles I Summary of Charges King Charles I of England is being charged as a dictator, double crosser, and killer; and an open and relentless adversary of the Commonwealth of England. He is sentenced for utilizing his capacity to seek after his own advantage as opposed to the benefit of England, and seething war against the parliament and the individuals of England. For the Defense My customer concedes, yet for a lesser accusation than death. He was just attempting to make the right decision for England. The individuals of England were experiencing a tough time and the nation required cash. At the point when my customer and the Parliament couldn't concur on terms of tax assessment and plans to fund-raise, his solitary decision was to break down Parliament. As ruler, he was ling power and the best way to recover that force was to take up arms against Parliament. We will compose a custom article test on Preliminary of King Charles or then again any comparative theme explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page We both concur that this war wasn't right and silly and numerous incredible lives were lost. We argue that his discipline ought to be evacuation as lord of England and Exile from this incredible nation. Witnesses 1. Oliver Cromwell Was for the Parliament, General of Horse in the military. I will utilize him to show that he intended to oust King Charles I before the common war had begun. 2. Jacob Castle Fought for the Royalist, Baron and Major General in the royalist armed force. Aristocrat Castle will help demonstrate King Charles I was an unassuming ruler. 3. Ralph Hops Commander of the royalist armed force and Baron of Stratton. Im utilizing Baron Hops to give data of what King Charles I had intended to do on the off chance that he had won the war. 4. George Goring-General of Horse for the Royalist armed force and Baron. George will offer his input of how it was to battle for King Charles I and the Royalist armed force 5. Charles Lucas Royalist, Lieutenant General of Horse. I will utilize Charles Lucas to tell everybody how life as a detainee was under the Parliamentary armed force. To the Jury: A roundhead is a supporter for the Parliament and a Cavalier is a supporter for the ruler. Rundown of Evidence [pick] If the parliament had concurred on tax assessment with King Charles I This war would have never have occurred and lives would Not have been lost. Oliver Cromwell was against King Charles marriage When King Charles wedded Henrietta Mar to make A coalition with France. Oliver Cromwell would not Know how to secure England. T you blame King Charles to murder to Englands Own kin, at that point you ought to charge the Parliament As well, since the two sides were English. Expectant Arguments Argument: King Charles upheld Catholics Answer: King Charles bolstered Louis XIII so England and France could become partners. Contention: King Charles began this war by attempting to raise burdens on the individuals of England. Answer: King Charles required cash from the wars he had battled to secure his nation. The Parliament were absurd and he no other method to fund-raise. Since the Parliament had not helped they were futile to him so he excused them. Partition of Church and State Just about everyone in England was Protestant, including the individuals from Parliament. Lord Charles I drove the Parliament mad by supporting Louis XIII catholic) who was at common war against Protestants. Lord Charles additionally wedded Henrietta Mar who was catholic. The strict issues ought not be remembered for this case since it is superfluous. Ruler Charles I is Protestant as is everybody in Parliament. Point of reference: I might want to see this cases result shape history by notice all lords, or even despots that on the off chance that they dont tune in to the individuals of their nation, they wont lead exceptionally long. Inquiries for Consideration: 1 . This occasion is depicted as the English Civil War in light of the fact that the English were battling the English. 2. I would have been a roundhead in light of the fact that having an outright ruler isn't the correct decision for a sort of government. 3. I think the effect the English Civil War will have is that different nations will over toss their rulers/sovereigns. 4. Oliver Cromwell turned into the Lord Protector of England, which is like the president, and the parliament is like the House of Representatives. 5. I decided to be a lawyer for the resistance in light of the fact that despite the fact that King Charles I settled on some off-base choices and caused the common war, I don't figure he ought to have been executed before several individuals. My decision didn't change all through my exploration.